In fresh troubles for Sahara, a US court has issued show-cause notice to the group in connection with a USD 350 million lawsuit seeking attachment of its two prized hotel assets here — Plaza and Dream Downtown.
The lawsuit has been filed by Hong Kong-based JTS Trading Ltd, which had proposed to partner UAE-based Trinity White City Ventures and arrange loans from Swiss banking giant UBS to acquire the crisis-ridden Indian group’s three overseas hotels — Grosvenor House in London and the two in New York.
In the lawsuit filed with the Supreme Court of the State of New York against Trinity, Sahara and UBS, JTS has now alleged that Trinity cut it off from the deal for direct negotiations with Sahara. JTS has also accused Sahara and UBS of having “aided and abetted” the UAE firm in breaching its “fiduciary duties” under their agreement.
Looking into the suit, the court has now passed an ‘order to show cause’, asking Sahara India Pariwar to show cause in the court on July 8 why “an order should not be made” for attaching the group’s interest in the Plaza and Dream Downtown hotels in New York.
There were no reply to queries mailed to Trinity and JTS in this regard, while an UBS spokesperson said the bank had “no comment” to offer on this matter.
When contacted, a Sahara spokesperson said the group is not doing any business with Trinity.
As per the documents filed with the court by JTS, it had formed a venture with Trinity earlier this year to buy the three hotels from Sahara, which has been seeking to arrange funds to ensure release of its chief Subrata Roy and two other top executives from Tihar Jail in New Delhi.
Under the proposed arrangement, JTS was to invest USD 850 million for a 70 per cent stake in a private equity fund for the acquisition, while Trinity was to contribute USD 250 million for a 30 per cent stake. UBS was to provide senior debt facilities for the transaction.
JTS, which also claimed having been appointed ‘exclusive arranger of fund’, further said that the proposed ‘Sahara portfolio’ transaction was earlier pegged at USD 1.1 billion, but later it was revised upward to USD 1.5 billion.
JTS further alleged in the lawsuit that it was cut off from the transaction at a later stage and Trinity entered into direct negotiations with Sahara with the help of the Indian group as well as UBS.
“Plaintiff (JTS) has been denied its rights under the agreement as the intended 70 per cent owner of the general partnership, including but not limited to various management fees which cannot presently be determined but which are estimated would have been in excess of USD 350 million, as well as the anticipated increase in the value of the target properties,” as per the suit.
Interestingly, Sahara group earlier this month announced that it has reached a deal with another party, Reuben Brothers, for transfer of its existing debt from Bank of China on the three hotels — thus averting a ‘default-triggered’ sale of the iconic Grosvenor House hotel in London.
The Grosvenor House hotel was put on sale by its lender Bank of China earlier this year after a ‘technical default’.
Sahara Group has been trying to raise funds to secure release of its Chairman Subrata Roy, who has been lodged in Tihar Jail for over a year, through monetisation of its various assets, including the three overseas hotels that it had purchased between 2010 and 2012 for USD 1.55 billion.
The group has been engaged in a legal battle with Indian markets regulator Sebi for a long time over a case involving raising of funds from investors to the tune of over Rs 24,000 crore. Sahara, however, claims it has already repaid 95 per cent of the investors money directly.
In the suit, JTS has alleged that Trinity and UBS “both acted intentionally and wilfully for the purpose of misappropriating for themselves opportunities and benefits justly belonging to Plaintiff”.
It further said that it has “suffered actual damages, and is entitled to judgement against all defendants, in an amount which cannot presently be determined but is estimated to be no less than USD 350 million plus appropriate interest, and is entitled to punitive damages of USD 350 million from Trinity and UBS”.
Among other pleas before the court, JTS has sought action “jointly and severally against defendants — Trinity White City Ventures Limited, Sahara India Pariwar, Aamby Valley (Mauritius) Ltd and UBS Financial Services, Inc — for actual damages which cannot presently be determined, but is presently estimated to be no less than USD 350,000,000, plus appropriate interest, and jointly and severally against Defendants — Trinity White City Ventures Limited and UBS Financial Services, Inc for punitive damages of USD 350,000,000.”
Last week, the Supreme Court of India set out conditions for release of Sahara chief Subrata Roy and other two executives from the jail and asked the group to make a total payment of Rs 36,000 crore in 18 months.
The court said that their release from jail was subject to deposit of Rs 5,000 crore in cash and Rs 5,000 crore in bank guarantee, as per an earlier court order, while the 18-month period would start from the date of his release after he fulfils the bail condition.
On release if Roy fails to adhere to meet the timeframe for depositing money or defaults in payment with the markets regulator Sebi, he will have to surrender to custody, the court further said.
Sibal said it was difficult to secure a bank guarantee of Rs 5,000 crore and wanted it to be reduced to Rs 4,000 crore.
The bench asked him to file an application in this regard and suggested that instead of Rs 5,000 crore in cash, Sahara should deposit Rs 6,000 crore in cash.